From: Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Date: 2010-03-04T10:04:30+09:00
Subject: Re: Class vs Module in constant lookup

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Peter McLain <peter.mclain@gemstone.com> wrote:

> The explanation for constant lookup in the Flanagan/Matz book, Section 7.9,
> starts off:
>
>  "When a constant is referenced without any qualifying namespace..." and
> then goes on to explain constant lookup.

Yes I also checked the book and albeit it is clear that the algorithm
applies to unqualified names, it is not that much clear what exactly
applies to qualified names.