From: Eric Christopherson <echristopherson@...>
Date: 2010-03-01T08:52:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Tk on Windows and Mac OS X 10.6

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI
<nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp> wrote:
> From: mdiam <maurice.diamantini@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Tk on Windows and Mac OS X 10.6
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:16:41 +0900
> Message-ID: <f758cf0f-774f-47a2-8069-1d53ea4b08f7@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
>> The FFI ffi-tk ruby project should work with any plateform
>> (e.g.  jruby but also macruby, etc...).
>> But if Hidetoshi hasn't choose that way (i.e. ffi) for tk,
>> propably there is a good reason (like the threads, or simply
>> it much more work ?)
>
> Because I'm not familiar with FFI, I don't have good ideas to soleve
> complexity of combination of callbacks, threads, and exceptions.
[...]

Manveru has an ffi-tk gem for Ruby 1.9. He says it should run on any
Ruby 1.9 installation that has FFI installed (either as a gem, as with
MRI, or as part of the installation, as with JRuby or Rubinius).

http://github.com/manveru/ffi-tk

Axel wrote:
> axel  DOD  friedrich_smail   ED  gmx  DOD  de

I think you meant "DOT" and "AT".