From: Intransition Date: 2010-02-17T20:38:13+09:00 Subject: Re: "Code must be Chunkable" On Feb 16, 11:41 am, James Coplien wrote: > I can see from the thread below that it was too much for the posters in > this thread, and that the posters were unable to correlate that example > with the description in the Artima article. The reason this is a bit > advanced is that it comes from the design thinking that Trygve and I > have put into DCI, rather than the nerd-level stuff. It doesn't cater to > UML-shaped heads, or even to the way that most people characterize > object-oriented programming. It is one of the more difficult ideas in > DCI, and it is the one that most people trip on. Most people have so > much trouble fitting into their mental model that they just say that it > is wrong, or stupid. It's O.K. if you feel that way: new paradigms are > hard, and it will take a while to unlearn old ways and to learn new. No matter how hard anew paradigms is, it must still be taught.