From: Josep Pujol Date: 2010-02-06T19:17:51+09:00 Subject: Re: embedding ruby Thanks for your answer. J旦rg W Mittag wrote: > Personally, I would look at Rubinius, JRuby or IronRuby for embedding, > rather than MRI or YARV. But really, I would look at Lua, because > while you can find a Ruby *implementation* that is specifically > designed for embedding, this doesn't change the fact that the Ruby > *language* isn't. > > jwm I've just downloaded the rubinius code and I read this statement in the README file. 5. Goals * Thread safety. Rubinius intends to be thread-safe so you could embed more than one interpreter in a single application. It does not currently meet this goal due to some components borrowed from the mainline Ruby interpreter. Is this true also for the 1.0 version? (or this is an old statement that hasn't been removed) About Lua, I've seen it, but my blind love about ruby is too strong... ;-) By the way, I've ruled out JRuby and IronRuby because they need extra components (java and mono). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.