From: "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...>
Date: 2010-01-31T05:32:43+09:00
Subject: Re: "require 'rubygems'" In Your Library/App/Tests Is Wrong?

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Josh Cheek:

> I wonder how many people _don't_ use rubygems. What creates more work,
> requiring rubygems so that people who don't want it don't have to use
> it, or not requiring rubygems so that people who do want it have to
> keep putting -rubygems when they load files?

Ruby 1.9 has RubyGems built-in, and for the legacy version you can
simply add -rubygems to your RUBY_OPTS and be done with the problem.

=E2=80=94 Shot
--=20
The truth knocks on the door and you say, =E2=80=98go away, I=E2=80=99m
looking for the truth=E2=80=99, and so it goes away. Puzzling.
                                        [Robert Pirsig]

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktklyoACgkQi/mCfdEo8UpsXACfUoWYwvo/TnSeAZXTeeBrEhoM
n2QAniiUOCbhPVHFL2tf7/vNjhBpaOGu
=7Ggl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--