From: Xavier Noria Date: 2010-01-31T04:05:17+09:00 Subject: Re: "require 'rubygems'" In Your Library/App/Tests Is Wrong? On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Josh Cheek wrote: > I wonder how many people _don't_ use rubygems. What creates more work, > requiring rubygems so that people who don't want it don't have to use it, or > not requiring rubygems so that people who do want it have to keep putting > -rubygems when they load files? If they installed your gem using rubygems they will load rubygems. They can't load your library otherwise in the first place. Executables may be a different story. The way dependencies are available in your client's machine is not your business! I gave several examples where rubygems may not be available at runtime.