From: John W Higgins <wishdev@...>
Date: 2009-12-28T15:11:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Trig value errors

--001636d34d04e62296047bc3c411
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:35 PM, jzakiya <jzakiya@mail.com> wrote:

>
> One thing is VERY CLEAR though.
>
> YOU, can't SHOW that my method is inaccurate for any
> angle value. Can YOU?
>

This is getting funnier by the moment. Gotta love someone that just doesn't
grasp utter failure. So we've got 67 degrees on the high side and how about
we pull out nice low number now to completly end the conversation. Lets try
4.269e-07 degrees shall we?

z = 4.269e-07

1.0 - (sin(PI/180*z) ** 2 + cos(PI/180*z) ** 2)
=> 0.0

Standard functions pass - anyone wanna guess what we're going to find when
we try the new concept? Anyone? Bueller?

1.0 - (sin1(PI/180*z) ** 2 + cos1(PI/180*z) ** 2)
=> 2.22044604925031e-16

Have you had enough?

John

--001636d34d04e62296047bc3c411--