From: David Masover <ninja@...>
Date: 2009-12-17T08:40:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Licence issues.

On Wednesday 16 December 2009 05:21:00 pm Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 17. Dez 2009, 03:14:33 +0900 schrieb Michael Shigorin:
> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:40:31AM +0900, Ben Bleything wrote:
> >> > > Do you have any suggestion on the type of licence?
> >> >
> >> > MIT/BSD.
> >>
> >> Or GPL, [...]
> >> Sorry, there's no one true answer to your question [...]
> >
> > I prefer BSD because it is so short that I can read it to the end
> > in a reasonable time.
> 
> Yup.  Also, it's not "viral" like the GPL.

That could be a good or bad thing. I almost wish there was a "viral" license 
that was short enough -- though as long as the GPL is, it does actually seem 
to be human-readable.

But I prefer BSD for both reasons -- both because I'm no longer as militantly 
Free Software as I used to be, and because I don't like any license bigger 
than my head.