From: Matt Bleh <phreakuencies@...>
Date: 2009-12-11T23:09:17+09:00
Subject: Re: "private" modules

David Masover wrote:
> Hmm... I'm not sure that's a good idea. Besides, the anonymous module 
> seems
> like overkill. Maybe people will like your Vector class?

Well the whole point is to provide a better implementation for Vector, 
and at the same time spare users from having to prefix with "A" every 
reference to Vector.

The B module is actually going to be used by many classes under A, so I 
can't just put it inside Vector.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.