From: Raymond O'Connor <nappin713@...>
Date: 2009-12-10T15:55:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Chain Method in Class with Method in Module

Aaron Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 01:33:58PM +0900, Raymond O'Connor wrote:
>> I'd like to chain setup in a unit test, so that it calls a method in a
>> module BEFORE running through the setup code.  I'd like to do it without
>> having to put super() in the test's setup method.
> 
> What's wrong with super()?  We use it in all of our other objects.
> Tests are normal objects too.  :-)

Trying to keep things as encapsulated as possible.  Just seems wrong 
that people including the module need to know to call super in setup 
before their own setup code.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.