From: Luis Lavena Date: 2009-12-10T06:45:12+09:00 Subject: Re: Why is Ruby 1.8.6 RC1 more recent than Ruby 1.8.6 Final? On Dec 9, 5:24 pm, Jian Lin wrote: > Getting to the Ruby One-click installer for Windows, we may go to > >    http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/ > > and then > >    http://rubyinstaller.org/download.html > > however over there, it seems that > >     Ruby 1.8.6 RC1 (patchlevel 383) > > is actually more recent than > >     Ruby 1.8.6 RC2 (patchlevel 27) > > or > >     Ruby 1.8.6 Final (patchlevel 26) > > If I install them on different machines, the RC1 actually shows a more > recent date than RC2 or Final, by using > > ruby -v > > What's the rule? Does it go strictly by patchlevel? That is, the > patchlevel decides how update it is, instead of whether it is RC1, RC2, > or Final? Here you're talking about a set of Installers, not Ruby itself. I've answered your question over Stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1876611/why-is-ruby-1-8-6-rc1-more-recent-than-ruby-1-8-6-final/1877105#1877105 Which I'm going to copy here for the sake of help others find the information in the future: "Hello, Ruby-Lang website advertise a package of Ruby for Windows called One- Click Installer. That installer used to have their own version schema, as you note with `186-26` or `186-27 RC2` On RubyForge website (news section) you will find that efforts of the project as moved towards newer RubyInstaller packages, and is indicated there and the RubyInstaller download page that `186-27 RC2` is part of the legacy versions. Latest RubyInstaller (currently in Release Candidate attempts) provide information of the correct Ruby version that includes and install, as indicated by the version string `1.8.6-p383` which is patchlevel 383 of Ruby. Please note that you're comparing different type of packages. One- Click Installer versus RubyInstaller. You can read more about this in the [wiki][1] and the latest announcement [at RubyForge][2] Hope this answer your questions. [1]: http://wiki.github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller [2]: http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=35591" -- Luis Lavena