From: "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" Date: 2009-12-06T00:57:57+09:00 Subject: gem cleanup/uninstall not dropping old executables? --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, dear readers of ruby-talk. I=E2=80=99m an avid user of gem update/gem cleanup pair, but I just noticed that gem cleanup does not drop old executables. After =E2=80=98gem install art-decomp -v 0.0.0; gem update; gem cleanup=E2= =80=99 I still have the ad-compare executable (which was in 0.0.0 but was renamed to ad-analyse in 0.1.0). Similarily, if I have both 0.0.0 and 0.1.0 installed and try to gem uninstall the 0.0.0 version, it will ask about removing the executables. If I decline, no executables get removed (so I end up with both 0.0.0=E2=80= =99s and 0.1.0=E2=80=99s executables); if I agree, I=E2=80=99m only left with ex= ecutables introduced in 0.1.0. I can understand gem uninstall=E2=80=99s behaviour, but would it make sense= that when I uninstall 0.0.0, there=E2=80=99s an option to remove the executables= used solely by that version? If there was an option for this, gem cleanup could use it by default. I=E2=80=99m writing to ruby-talk because I=E2=80=99m not sure I=E2=80=99m n= ot missing something about RubyGems; I=E2=80=99m also not sure where to report a bug =E2=80=93 o= n RubyForge=E2=80=99s bug tracker or on Ruby=E2=80=99s Redmine (now that RubyGems are a part of 1= =2E9). =E2=80=94 Shot --=20 Anyone who finds the MS Office ribbon intuitive is not a member of the human species as I understand it. [William Morgan] --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksagwEACgkQi/mCfdEo8UqEdQCff5Gqpa3VKMP5s2AgUjK0W8So NrYAoMXT83gtZDy4euIOLySssZ9j2+me =4mOt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--