From: Seebs Date: 2009-11-09T03:10:13+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby doesn't implement x++ for Fixnum's because ??? On 2009-11-08, Rick DeNatale wrote: > If you think of object as simply meaning what holds the state of what > is denoted by a variable, then C variables hold objects, and since a > pointer represents state, even pointer's can be considered objects in > this degenerate (if you will) form. Insofar as anything in C is "an object", pointers are. -s -- Copyright 2009, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@seebs.net http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!