From: Tony Arcieri Date: 2009-11-04T14:38:55+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby doesn't implement x++ for Fixnum's because ??? --0016e64dca94c30e670477850676 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Michael W. Ryder <_mwryder55@gmail.com>wrote: > Maybe I am missing something > Yes, maybe you're missing that I support a unary ++ operator :) I can see the wisdom in not having it there to begin with though. I see the ++ operator as something almost inextricably tied to for loops in C. Ruby provides better looping mechanisms, like the various Enumerable methods that take blocks! Perhaps Matz didn't include a unary ++ operator as encouragement to use better looping constructs in your code. If that's the case, I think he certainly succeeded. -- Tony Arcieri Medioh/Nagravision --0016e64dca94c30e670477850676--