From: Ehsanul Hoque <ehsanul_g3@...>
Date: 2009-10-30T11:36:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby style question (many-arg methods)

--_7f851ffb-0f30-4550-adee-6740a83f3d26_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Well=2C you should realize that leading whitespace on each new line is remo=
ved in emails and the like. So use some web service instead=2C like pastie.=
 I assume you mean you use this method currently: http://pastie.org/676220

Well=2C I might do something like this (but I'm sure many would consider th=
at ugly - just a personal preference really): http://pastie.org/676224

> Date: Fri=2C 30 Oct 2009 11:22:12 +0900
> From: cruzmail.ngreen@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Ruby style question (many-arg methods)
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>=20
>=20
> >=20
> > Currently I use the last one=2C because that way at least there is a so=
rt
> > of ruby-ish block.  But the "conceptual decoupling" of the function fro=
m
> > the block trips me up occasionally.
> >=20
> > Anyway=2C just got frustrated reading old code and was wondering if any=
one
> > had a good solution for me =3Bp
>=20
> Oops=2C wrote this all out of whack=2C currently I use this:
>=20
> Net::SSH.start(
>  server=2C
>  user=2C:
>  password=3D>password=2C
>  :port=3D>port=2C
>  :other_stuff =3D> somevariable=2C
>  :foo =3D> bar=2C
>  :baz =3D> qux) do |ssh|
>   foo =3D new_foo
> end
>=20
> But thats a weird half-indentation thing and I dno how I feel about it=2C=
=20
> would maybe work if ruby indentatino were 4-space.  I've tried the last=20
> one (above) recently but the aforementioned decoupling trips me up
> --=20
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>=20
 		 	   		 =20
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: I wanted more reliable=2C now it's more reliable. Wow!
http://microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/default-ga.aspx?h=3Dmyidea?ocid=3DPI=
D24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_myidea:102009=

--_7f851ffb-0f30-4550-adee-6740a83f3d26_--