From: Jonathan Castello <solugon@...>
Date: 2009-09-22T11:01:06+09:00
Subject: Re: redirect STDOUT to function?

--_9a92b937-3016-41ab-b320-52fdd0ef6555_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On the module suggestion=2C that would definitely be pretty great! Also=2C =
I've already considered the IO-like class=2C and I'm just not sure where to=
 start. I don't know what method(s) puts/p/gets/et cetera depend on=2C or w=
hat the dependencies depend on=3B it's a fairly difficult problem for a new=
comer to Ruby like me.
> Date: Tue=2C 22 Sep 2009 10:44:43 +0900
> From: cmdicely@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: redirect STDOUT to function?
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>=20
> On Mon=2C Sep 21=2C 2009 at 6:07 PM=2C Jonathan Castello <solugon@hotmail=
.com> wrote:
>=20
> > I know that $stdout and others can be reassigned to other IO objects=2C=
 but I haven't yet found a way to reliably
> > redirect through a function instead. Of course=2C this is probably beca=
use I'm relatively new to Ruby.
> > Does anyone know how I could do something like this?~Jonathan Castello
>=20
> I haven't tried this=2C but you should be able to create an IO-like
> class/object where the methods you care about are (or call) the custom
> functions you want to use. It would be nice if there was an module you
> could mix into an object that implemented a few of the more basic
> function which would build on those to provide the rest of the IO
> interface=2C the way Enumerable builds on an "each" method in the class
> its mixed into.
>=20
_________________________________________________________________
Ready for Fall shows? Use Bing to find helpful ratings and reviews on digit=
al tv's.
http://www.bing.com/shopping/search?q=3Ddigital+tv's&form=3DMSHNCB&publ=3DW=
LHMTAG&crea=3DTEXT_MSHNCB_Vertical_Shopping_DigitalTVs_1x1=

--_9a92b937-3016-41ab-b320-52fdd0ef6555_--