From: James Britt <james.britt@...>
Date: 2009-09-13T01:08:46+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 rdoc never ends (Re: rdoc)

Marvin G�lker wrote:

> Hi,
> I had no problems to generate RDoc for my 1.9.1p243 Ruby, but I didn't 
> let it document the Ruby installation directory, but the unpackaged 
> sources tarball. Is there any difference?

A very big difference, since the idea is to run rdoc over source code, 
not compiled binaries.

I've been running rdoc over the 1.9 source tree, and if I omit the lib 
and ext dirs it runs very quickly, but if I try to rdoc everything it 
just eats memory, and after an hour or 2 I just kill it.


> My RDoc version is 2.3.0 and I'm using the hanna template. By the way, I 
> did this with the 1.9 RDoc gem.
> 

I'm trying to use the rdoc the ships with 1.9, which (presumably) should 
work fine.

ruby 1.9.1p243 (2009-07-16 revision 24175) [i386-darwin9.7.0]



-- 
James Britt

www.jamesbritt.com           - Playing with Better Toys
www.ruby-doc.org             - Ruby Help & Documentation
www.rubystuff.com            - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
www.neurogami.com            - Smart application development