From: "Marvin Gülker" <sutniuq@...>
Date: 2009-09-13T00:36:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 rdoc never ends (Re: rdoc)

Roger Pack wrote:
> Ryan Davis wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 2009, at 21:28 , James Britt wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>> I've tried running the 1.8.6 rdoc over the 1.9 sources, and it fails  
>>> over some rdoc syntax error.
>>>
>>> How long *should* it take to gen the 1.9 rdocs?
>> 
>> install rdoc2
> 
> Let me know if anybody has success with this.  I haven't been able to 
> get *any* rdoc to correctly parse 1.9 yet.

Hi,
I had no problems to generate RDoc for my 1.9.1p243 Ruby, but I didn't 
let it document the Ruby installation directory, but the unpackaged 
sources tarball. Is there any difference?
My RDoc version is 2.3.0 and I'm using the hanna template. By the way, I 
did this with the 1.9 RDoc gem.

Marvin
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.