From: Ryan Davis Date: 2009-09-11T05:50:04+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9, Rubygems, and .gemspec warnings On Sep 10, 2009, at 13:42 , Rob Sanheim wrote: > I don't think so, I can reproduce this without jeweler in the mix at > all. > bug: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=27087&group_id=126&atid=575 > > code: > http://github.com/rsanheim/ruby19_rubygems_bug/blob/09a9f683fe7848980e10ac7bd2291040ec11ea17/Rakefile > > failing build against ruby 1.9: > http://runcoderun.com/rsanheim/ruby19_rubygems_bug/builds/09a9f683fe7848980e10ac7bd2291040ec11ea17/1/ruby_191 I just repro'd this with: > % multiruby -rubygems -rrubygems/specification -e 0 > ... > VERSION = 1.9.1-p129 > CMD = ~/.multiruby/install/1.9.1-p129/bin/ruby -rubygems - > rrubygems/specification -e 0 > > WARNING: #' for nil:NilClass> > ... > RESULT = 0 > > TOTAL RESULT = 0 failures out of 4 > > Passed: 1.9.1-p129, 1.8.7-p72, 1.8.7-p160, 1.8.6-p368 > Failed: That's easy enough to poke around at. I'll get eric's eyeballs on it.