From: "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@...>
Date: 2009-09-04T03:22:23+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: Sequel 3.4.0 Released

El Jueves, 3 de Septiembre de 2009, Jeremy Evans escribió:

> DataMapper probably has a greater emphasis on performance than Sequel
> does, but I haven't done any comparative benchmarking between the two.

I expected that DataMapper is more oriented to be a ORM while Sequel is like 
an abstract SQL layer not so oriented to be a ORM. In this way, I really 
expected that Sequel was more efficient.


> FWIW, if performance is the most important criteria, I'm not sure why
> you'd pick ruby as the implementation language.

It's important, but not the only criteria :)


> In any case, Sequel does support transactions and prepared statements.
> I know DataMapper supports transactions, but I'm not sure about prepared
> statements.

Yes, it does.

 
> For further details, you should probably read the documentation I linked
> previously.

I did :)

Thanks.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>