From: Jeremy Evans <code@...>
Date: 2009-09-03T23:46:56+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: Sequel 3.4.0 Released

Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/9/3 Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net>:
>> If you plan to use an SQL database, Sequel is a better choice, IMO.
> 
> Could I know some reason? Is it more efficient?
> I don't need cool features (just transaction support and maybe
> prepared statement). I would prefer the faster solution.

DataMapper probably has a greater emphasis on performance than Sequel 
does, but I haven't done any comparative benchmarking between the two. 
FWIW, if performance is the most important criteria, I'm not sure why 
you'd pick ruby as the implementation language.

In any case, Sequel does support transactions and prepared statements. 
I know DataMapper supports transactions, but I'm not sure about prepared 
statements.

For further details, you should probably read the documentation I linked 
previously.

Jeremy
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.