From: "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" Date: 2009-09-03T01:44:58+09:00 Subject: What licensing info is needed in code headers? --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Disclaimer: I know that some of you live in jurisdictions that do not allow you to give legal adivce, and I=E2=80=99m not seeking it =E2=80=93 I= =E2=80=99m merely asking for a good practice. :) I like my code as clean as possible, and so I=E2=80=99d love to have my cod= e to have as little cruft as possible. Given that I say in the README file that the code is licensed under a given licence (located in the LICENCE file), do I have to add licensing info to each and every file anyway? If so, what=E2=80=99s the shortest info I can add to make sure that a given= file is covered by the licence? =E2=80=94 Shot --=20 Robbery is not just another way of making a living, rape is not just another way of satisfying basic human needs, torture is not just another way of interrogation. And XML is not just another way of writing S-exps. There are some things in life that you do not do if you want to be a moral being and feel proud of what you have accomplished. [Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp] --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqen2kACgkQi/mCfdEo8Ur2qACcDyMY/OCggZgT9pXhK+OVmBMo z28AniIEwMelEFt77r2uJ26/lijgSWLV =9YJE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--