From: Kevin <darkintent@...>
Date: 2009-08-29T12:25:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Editor

--001517740ab230045604723f5bb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I can't say I disagree, but I do like being able to control mpd and read
PDF's inside Emacs.  Not to mention Emacs' ability to run as a daemon.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM, pbj <postittothenewsgroup@nospam.com>wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:19:56 -0500, Robert Dober wrote:
>
>
> >> Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it for a
> >> long time. A time much too long...
> > Now this is subtle lobbying ;). But I am with you of course.
> >
> > OTOH if you do not try out emacs you will never know what you like
> > better. And IIRC there are simply no other choices (1)(unless on MAC)
> > ;). R.
>
> IMHO they all suck, *especially* vim and emacs. However, I've found emacs
> to be an excellent editor construction kit for rolling my own.
>
>
> >
> > (1) For editors, IDEs are a different history that shall be told a
> > different time.
>
>
>

--001517740ab230045604723f5bb8--