From: Chuck Remes Date: 2009-08-26T05:10:10+09:00 Subject: Re: eventmachine and threads On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Julien Schmurfy wrote: > Hi, > I have an eventmachine machine ruby server which goal is to serve > requests but for each request it needs to do some requests to others > servers, I know this could be achievied easily in a full asynchronous > way but we have some restrictions currently which forbid that. > > The current way we do it is by issuing the request and then freezing > the > thread which is woke up when the answer arrives, the code that does > the > request looks like (I have kept only the essential, sendRequest simply > build the request and send it on the eventmachine socket): > > def sendSyncRequest(obj_name, cmd_name, args = {}, peer = nil) > raise "Cannot freeze main thread, synchronous call cannot be made in > eventmachine thread !!!" if EM::reactor_thread? > # in reactor loop > # issue the call and put the thread to sleep, wake up on return > th = Thread.current > return_value = nil > error = nil > > req = sendRequest(obj_name, cmd_name, args, peer) > > req.errback do |err| > error = err > th.wakeup > th.priority= 1 > th.priority= 0 > end > > req.callback do |ret| > return_value = ret > th.wakeup > th.priority= 1 > th.priority= 0 > end > > # go to sleep > sleep > > # return result or error > > end > Try using EM#defer (which you "kind of" duplicated with your code above). It uses an internal thread pool (default 20) to run your synchronous stuff. When complete it executes a callback. Here's an example: def receive_data chunk sync_operation = proc { # do sync operation } callback = proc { # called when sync_operation completes } EM.defer sync_operation, callback end > My problem is that 30% of the requests made this way take 200ms or a > little more to return when the packet on the network arrived in less > than 5ms (I used ngrep to sniff what happens on the network and check > the timings). > > The priority change in each callback made our problem a little less > problematic by reducing this 30% number but I wish to find a better > and > real solution if any exists, I hate writing code without understanding > why some things happen and this is exactly the case here... > I suppose the priority change reschedule the thread to the top of the > queue but I doubt this hack will continue to work with high > concurrency. EM.defer uses threads internally. On MRI Ruby these are green threads (cooperative multitasked) whereas JRuby gives you native threads (that can preempt). If you have hard timing requirements JRuby is probably a better bet since you can get real parallelism. Of course, this doesn't matter if your sync operation is merely blocking on an external resource though it would matter a lot if it were compute bound. I hope this helps. cr