From: Marco Mastrodonato <m.mastrodonato@...>
Date: 2009-08-24T21:31:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Comparison Ruby, Python, Php, Groovy ecc.

Marc Heiler wrote:
> Two things I notice.
> 
> It seems ruby 1.9 indeed managed to keep up with the python versions 
> more than the older ruby versions. And it seems to be (almost) as fast 
> as perl for that test.
> 
> The other thing, which is very strange, is that the ironruby 
> implementation is significantly slower than ironpython, whereas the 
> other versions arent by as much. What is wrong here?
> 

1. Python is still faster, but version 1.9.1 goes very well catching up 
good results, goes better than perl, its script was been very optimized 
to get that result, 2.7s against 4s of the normal version.

2. I think there aren't correlation between these versions: Ironruby, 
ironpython, ruby and python are different projects and with different 
development.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.