From: Peter Bailey Date: 2009-08-20T02:29:20+09:00 Subject: Re: One-click Windows installer for Ruby 1.9. Luis Lavena wrote: > On Aug 19, 10:26�am, Peter Bailey wrote: >> >> I tried this Ruby, and, I have to say, it leaves something to be >> desired. It doesn't do a complete install, meaning, it doesn't put Ruby >> in the path and it doesn't do an association of .rb with Ruby. Also, I >> just can't get Ruby 1.9 to work properly with all of my gems and stuff, >> so, I've just gone back to 1.8. > > Sorry for not fulfilling your expectations and our hard work is not up > to your "desired" standards. > > To answer your _issues_: > > * Adding Ruby to the PATH requires administrative privileges. The > installer doesn't ask for them to be safely installed into corporate > environments. > > * It doesn't associate .rb or .rbw files because changes in the > registry related to file associations ALSO require administrative > privileges > > * Ruby 1.9 is not meant to be compatible with Ruby 1.8, that is a > fact, and everybody knows about it. > > Please refer to the FAQ for other questions that you may have: > > http://wiki.github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/faq > > If you want something different, please, be my guest and fork the > project, patches are always welcome. I am a full administrator. Uh, not "meant to be compatible with 1.8." Gee, that doesn't make a lot of sense to me, frankly. But, I'll just live with it. Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.