From: Rick DeNatale Date: 2009-08-17T21:38:11+09:00 Subject: Re: Bizarre Range behavior On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > I admit 1.8 behavior in above example is simpler to implement, but 1.9 > behavior follows our (or more precisely "my") unwritten expectation of > character iteration. Matz, FWIW, and I don't think I'm alone, my expectations are based on Ruby being object oriented meaning, for example, that things related to iteration/enumeration should be understandable based on messages being sent to the elements. Any magic which can't be explained in these terms 'astonishes' me. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale