From: Kevin Rutherford Date: 2009-08-05T21:31:13+09:00 Subject: Re: Kind of ParsTree for 1.9.1 Hi Macario, > Does anyone else craves AST manipulation in 1.9.1 as bad as me? Reek (http://github.com/kevinrutherford/reek/tree) will miss ParseTree in 1.9 too, because it means that some of its Rspec matchers no longer work. Without ParseTree (or equivalent) it's not possible to write: MyClass.should_not reek > Anyone care to join? I don't have much time available, but I'll be happy to help. As Ryan suggests, the starting point will be a decent suite of regression tests. Cheers, Kevin -- m: +44 (0) 797 356 3521 w: http://www.kevinrutherford.co.uk e: kevin@rutherford-software.com t: @kevinrutherford l: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinrutherford