From: Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Date: 2009-08-03T21:41:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Fwd: ruby_frame in 1.8 is what in 1.9?

> I will, once I can get this thing built. What is the deal with Ruby 
> 1.9.1 /
> 1.9.2 no longer including certain header files in the install?

> 
> yuck! What is up with this and can we get this decision reversed? Or is
> there another way around this?

One option would be to create a "ruby sources" gem that includes the 
*.h, *.inc files from "each known patch number" of ruby.
a la
require 'ruby_sources'
RubySources.source_directory_for_current_ruby # => 
'/lib/gems/ruby_sources/include/ruby-1.9.1-p129' or what not

Then the question becomes "should said gem include the full source or 
just the headers"? [it probably wouldn't hurt much at all to include the 
full sources--disk space is cheap, right?].
Thoughts?
=r
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.