From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2009-07-24T08:05:48+09:00
Subject: Re: 1.9 test woe

On Jul 23, 2009, at 06:31, Roger Pack wrote:
>>> However--is this a bug?  Does this mean that minitest isn't totally
>>> compatible?
>>
>> It's not.  The library you're porting is probably doing something
>> wrong if it needs AutoRunner.  Where is the code?
>
> It came from running the http://github.com/coatl/sequence unit tests  
> in
> 1.9

It looks like the AutoRunner is only needed to set the seed across all  
test instances.  If you just have a plain setter at the class level  
you should be able to ditch all that code.