From: Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>
Date: 2009-07-24T00:57:53+09:00
Subject: Re: 1.9 test woe

On 7/23/09, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> However--is this a bug?  Does this mean that minitest isn't totally
>>> compatible?
>>
>> It's not.  The library you're porting is probably doing something
>> wrong if it needs AutoRunner.  Where is the code?
>
> It came from running the http://github.com/coatl/sequence unit tests in
> 1.9
> I'm working with the author on it, too.

Using ObjectSpace.each_object on the same line. Definitely a hack.
Sequence inherited that test from its predecessor, cursor, which was
written by someone else. I doubt those tests even work anymore.
(Please take note of the first 2 lines of that file...) I don't
understand or use them. I kept the old tests around  because they
seemed to be doing some very clever things and I hoped to eventually
be able to port them to sequence's new api.... sorry for any
confusion.