From: Tom Cloyd Date: 2009-07-21T00:07:11+09:00 Subject: Re: ruby IDE's Well, the question of editors is entirely different from that of IDEs. One can employ a good editor (I use jEdit, and it's excellent -also platform independent) without all the front end nonsense of an IDE. Admittedly, however, for some people an IDE may seem a good idea. But what does it really do for you? A good editor plus IDE plus a decent testing tool puts you in business with the lowest possible overhead. Why not go that direction? Simple, direct, and fast. No nonsense. t. Rilindo Foster wrote: > I second on Netbeans and the sentiment IDEs. They become very > important once you start work with Rails. > > (If not an IDE, at least a good Editor that supports Ruby very well. I > would recommend Komodo editor, Emacs (for Linux/Mac) or TextMate). > On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Wesley Chen wrote: > >> I don't agree the guy Tom. >> For the testers, the efficient is quite important. >> I recommend Netbeans6.7 ruby version. >> >> Thanks. >> Wesley Chen. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote: >> >>> to an IDE. I simply don't see any advantage at all. >>> > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC - Private practice Psychotherapist Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226 << tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health weblog) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~