From: Sebastian Hungerecker <sepp2k@...>
Date: 2009-07-14T20:35:38+09:00
Subject: Re: a regex that does not contain comma

Am Dienstag 14 Juli 2009 12:48:25 schrieb Axel Schmalowsky:
> Well, negative logic .. ;-)

Wich does not work if you pass the regexp as an argument to a method instead 
of using it in a conditional.


> This regexp matches correctly if the string consists only of a comma:
>
> /(?>(?:\w+\s*)*(?=,))+/

So does /,/. Honestly, what's wrong with /,/? Or /(?=,)/ if you really need it 
to not consume the match, though I don't see why you would.