From: Tom Cloyd Date: 2009-07-04T07:55:36+09:00 Subject: Re: RDoc 2.3 now with Darkfish, without CHM and extra HTML t Roger Pack wrote: > Eric Hodel wrote: > >> This release of RDoc brings some big changes. Most notably Michael >> Granger�s Darkfish generator has become the default output format for >> RDoc! Michael put a ton of great work into this, and it looks quite >> lovely. Check out the RDoc documentation for a sample: >> > > I like darkfish. Thought I'd pipe in a couple suggestions. > > 1) the method names include a prefix '#' > which makes single letter method names hard to read > > 2) the font is low contrast so harder to read. > > Just talking out loud. > =r > I totally concur about the low contrast fonts. Accessibility gurus say DON'T DO THIS. People with aging eyes - like me - find these fonts significantly harder to read. People with genuine vision impairments find them simply impossible, often. Iron rule: if you put something on a website which people are expected to read, make it black font against a light background. Large fonts can be reverse-color - IF distinctly large AND well contrasted with a dark back ground. This is a basic design aspect of webpages (or CSS sheets) which MUST be attended to if usability matters to anyone at all. t. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tom Cloyd, MS MA, LMHC - Private practice Psychotherapist Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A: (360) 920-1226 << tc@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health weblog) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~