From: Garry Freemyer Date: 2009-07-02T09:00:18+09:00 Subject: Re: 64-bit Ruby for OS X ? --0-439522174-1246492417=:52729 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Small minds can't cope with diversity. ________________________________ From: Ryan Davis To: ruby-talk ML Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 3:45:08 PM Subject: Re: 64-bit Ruby for OS X ? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? On Jul 1, 2009, at 14:28 , Jordon Bedwell wrote: > I personally won't use anything that isn't under x64. No offense to people > who are scared about memory usage but I prefer to be able to address my > 12GB+ of Ram on each of my servers without needing to hack my Kernel for > anything more than security, and speed. I've had no problems with the > memory the gentleman reported with memory consumption crawling on OSX, BSD > or Debian so perhaps it's just a bad compile in his behalf? Our Daemons that > monitor our main server would have caught a memory leak if it was happening > but they haven't yet and even on a check with the amount of hits we get, our > total memory usage for Ruby is only 1.5GB total for all 15 Processes that > run Ruby. such sophistication and yet you still top-post... --0-439522174-1246492417=:52729--