From: Yossef Mendelssohn <ymendel@...>
Date: 2009-06-30T04:50:26+09:00
Subject: Re: RDoc-style documentation for Ruby keywords

On Jun 29, 2:35 pm, Rob Biedenharn <R...@AgileConsultingLLC.com>
wrote:
> Since its related to 'rescue', I'll point out that you can also use  
> 'else' to indicate code that only gets executed if none of the rescue  
> clauses are (i.e., there is no exception). This is, of course, not  
> like 'ensure' with is executed regardless.

Really? This is the first I've heard of this, and it seems kind of
strange.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the point of the 'else' clause, but
wouldn't you put code that "only gets executed if none of the rescue
clauses are (i.e., there is no exception)" in the main body of what
you're adding rescues to? (viz. begin block, method definition)

--
-yossef