From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2009-06-28T22:16:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Attr Methods and object setters

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Fabian
Streitel<karottenreibe@googlemail.com> wrote:

> But for any normal class that does not provide DSL semantics, I'd still go
> with normal
> getters and setters. I just don't see the point of reducing the amount of my
> typing by
> a single =, when on the other hand I have to either construct a whole array
> each time
> or introduce a new neutral element.
>
> To mee that just doesn't feel right, I guess...

Oh, I'm not sure if we crossed threads at some point, but I was
suggesting using that approach *only* for DSLs.
So we are totally in agreement.

-greg