From: Fernando Guillen <fguillen.mail@...>
Date: 2009-06-28T02:42:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Trying to define a 'class' without using 'class' sentence

Robert Dober wrote:
> On 6/27/09, Fernando Guillen <fguillen.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Robert Dober wrote:
>>
>>> and from within Ruby there are several pieces of information you might
>>> find useful:
>>>
>>> http://pastie.org/526389
>>
>> Thanks Robert.. very funny code :)
> 
>> :/
>>
>> Is this the relevant information about the kind of my interpreter is?
> As far as I am concerned this contains about anything you need to
> know. Are you missing something specific?

I was expecting something more explicit, some one of the list J旦rg 
offered us:

<quote>
 XRuby and JRuby implement them in Java, IronRuby and
 Ruby.NET implement them in C#, Red Sun in ActionScript, Cardinal in
 PIR, MacRuby in Objective-C, MRI, YARV and tinyrb in C.
</quote>

>>
>>  #["RUBY_PLATFORM", "universal-darwin9.0"]
> This is the platform Ruby was built for, seems to be OS-X.
> But the VERSION and PATCHLEVEL is more important concerning the
> "behavior" of the interpreter or VM. In your case MRI with a quite
> recent patchlevel. Congrats ;)
> This, however is a more conservative Ruby version. You might want
> 1.8.7 or 1.9.1 for exploration.

Thanks for the explanation Robert

f.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.