From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2009-06-25T05:46:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Time for a ruby-announce list?

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:12:16AM +0900, Gregory Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Dober<robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Yossef Mendelssohn<ymendel@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 24, 11:44�am, Roger Pack <rogerpack2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> subscribing to ruby-talk is too much traffic and I'm too lazy to setup a
> >>> filter in my gmail. �Barrier to entry.
> >>
> >> Considering it should take you less than 30 seconds to make a gmail
> >> filter, my suggestion to you is "become less lazy".
> > I have enough of them,
> > I do not want other announcements to go to the release label and there
> > are other issues that have been discussed.
> > I can happily live with the majority being against Tom's idea, but I
> > feel that the "c'on use a label" or your friendly "be less lazy", ty
> > very much ;), simply does not Tom's idea the thinking and credit it
> > deserves.
> 
> Man, I really wish there was a parallel universe where you and Trans
> could be happy with how things are going, so that we don't need to go
> through the same cycle of:

loop do

> Trans:  I want thing Foo
> Rest of RubyTalk: This has come up many times before, and here's what happened
> Robert: Hey come on, don't be hard on Trans.

  sleep rand(100)

end

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/