From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2009-06-19T15:35:36+09:00
Subject: Re: each by arity

2009/6/19 trans <transfire@gmail.com>:

> Perhaps, but I must think about it some more. Presently one would do
> (in 1.9):
>
>  coll.each_slice(n){ ... }
>  coll.each_cons(n){ ... }
>
> If one wanted to map over that:
>
>  coll.map.each_slice(n){ ... }
>  coll.map.each_cons(n){ ... }
>
> correct?

For mapping in 1.9 I would do

coll.each_slice(n).map{ ... }
coll.each_cons(n).map{ ... }

> So how do we best achieve "by arity" without stepping on present toes?

I would simply stick with the existing behavior. :-)

Kind regards

robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/