From: pjb@... (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
Date: 2009-06-17T23:20:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Why is attr_accessor also mutator?

bjorn borg <borgagassi@yahoo.com> writes:

> Sorry for the "nitpicky question" but I'm new to Ruby and was
> wondering why attr_accessor was used to implicitly define accessor
> AND a mutator when the name attr_accessor itself has nothing
> alluding to mutation (i.e. attr_accessor_mutator).

   Accessors = Readers ∪ Writers

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__