From: bjorn borg <borgagassi@...>
Date: 2009-06-17T23:00:48+09:00
Subject: Why is attr_accessor also mutator?


Sorry for the "nitpicky question" but I'm new to Ruby and was wondering why attr_accessor was used to implicitly define accessor AND a mutator when the name attr_accessor itself has nothing alluding to mutation (i.e. attr_accessor_mutator).