From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2009-06-14T12:41:13+09:00
Subject: Re: pr-zlib 1.0.0 - A Pure Ruby zlib library

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rogerpack2005@gmail.com [mailto:rogerpack2005@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: pr-zlib 1.0.0 - A Pure Ruby zlib library
> 
> 
> > I wonder if this would be more desirable actually in the standard
> > library for the reasons you give.
> 
> or perhaps included with rubygems as a backup?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=22220&group_id=126&atid=578

Originally I was going to use zliby, but I think what we'll do is try to load pr/zlib if zlib can't be found. So, you'll have to install one or the other first at some point, but at least you'll have a choice.

Regards,

Dan