From: Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@...>
Date: 2009-06-12T23:01:15+09:00
Subject: Re: method= and block

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:55 AM, James
French<James.French@naturalmotion.com> wrote:
> I would really like to an associate a block in this way. Is there a way round this?

I don't think so. It isn't parsed as a normal method call, its parsed
as a special construct with the = that is converted into a method call
in a way which doesn't support picking up a block. I don't really
think that using = this way would be a good idea even if you could.