From: James Coglan <jcoglan@...>
Date: 2009-06-10T18:44:55+09:00
Subject: Re: [ruby-core:23784] Observable on Set?

--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>

> Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage
> instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing
> observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data
> structures could be improved?
>


Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 uses a Hash. Sorry!

--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316--