From: Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Date: 2009-05-30T21:58:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Pythonic indentation (or: beating a dead horse)

> What I mean is..
> if endless ruby code is allowed, it cannot be strictly optional.  If a
> core class or any other class/project that you utilize is coded without
> ends, then you get endless ruby whether you want it or not.

I think core classes will take a long time before any would be written 
in endless style, so till then it could be optional.  Or did I 
misunderstand?
That being said, if there were an endless gem then gems that are written 
in endless could just depend on it. Thank you to the gems devs.
-=r
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.