From: Michael Bruschkewitz Date: 2009-05-30T06:50:14+09:00 Subject: Re: Pythonic indentation (or: beating a dead horse) "Reid Thompson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1243609487.3435.5.camel@raker.ateb.com... > What I mean is.. > if endless ruby code is allowed, it cannot be strictly optional. If a > core class or any other class/project that you utilize is coded without > ends, then you get endless ruby whether you want it or not. For this reason, wouldn't it be possible to add an "option"-parameter to "require"?