From: J Haas <Myrdred@...>
Date: 2009-05-29T05:40:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Pythonic indentation (or: beating a dead horse)

On May 28, 1:25 pm, Rimantas Liubertas <riman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, you can go to Python list and make a request to implement those
> parts that you like in Ruby.

I could. But frankly, there are more good features of Ruby missing
from Python than there are good features of Python missing from Ruby.
And implementing the biggest feature missing from Ruby would not be
terribly difficult, and would be fully optional and backward
compatible. I'm not sure that any of these things are true about
Python's deficiencies with respect to Ruby.

> Imperfection is in the eye of the beholder.

Do you disagree that Ruby is imperfect? If so, which version is
perfect, 1.8 or 1.9?