From: Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
Date: 2009-05-29T04:40:52+09:00
Subject: Re: Pythonic indentation (or: beating a dead horse)


On May 28, 2009, at 2:33 PM, James Britt wrote:
> But we're back in the realm of subjectivity regarding what is "bare  
> minimum of code" and "superfluous".  Ruby could be made quite terse,  
> but that's not a proper goal.
>
> There is value in redundancy, and the trick is to find the right  
> balance, not to eliminate it completely.


+1