From: Boby Selamet Hartono <vecciora@...>
Date: 2009-05-21T07:45:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.8 vs. Ruby 1.9

--00163630f1d7c7dad2046a5fc693
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/5/21 Joshua Collins <kidguko@gmail.com>

> What about 'Programming Ruby 1.9: The Pragmatic Programmers' Guide' ?
>
> I know they have a 1.8 version of the book as well, but does the 1.9
> version
> of the book go over 1.8 and 1.9 both?
>
> I also saw a book promoted here on the list called, 'The Well-Grounded
> Rubyist'. It mainly covers 1.9 as well.
>
> Have any of you read these two as well?
>
> I will take a look at that O'Reilly's book ... I have not seen that one
> yet.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Michael J. I. Jackson <
> mjijackson@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > If you're looking for a good book that covers both 1.8 and 1.9, I
> > highly recommend O'Reilly's "The Ruby Programming Language". It's the
> > most comprehensive and concise reference that I've found, and it
> > bridges the gap between 1.8 and 1.9 nicely, explaining the differences
> > between the two as you go.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Joshua Collins <kidguko@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I was wondering the exact same thing!
> > >
> > > Before I knew 1.9 was coming out I got a 1.8 book, and I have gone
> > through
> > > it. However, I am wondering if I should get a 1.9 book now and learn
> it.
> > >
> > > I have not started any major projects using Ruby just yet, and am
> curious
> > if
> > > I should practice with 1.8 some before I learn 1.9 or just jump into
> 1.9
> > and
> > > start using it for projects?
> > >
> > > My only concern is the lack of Gem support 1.9 might have right now. Is
> > it
> > > something a new comer should worry with? Or, should I just forget the
> > lack
> > > of Gem support and know that Gem's will eventually update to 1.9 and
> new
> > > Gems will be made for 1.9.
> > >
> > > Anyhow, I know that I will want to learn 1.9 at some point. I just do
> not
> > > want to jump in and be a bad position to progress in my learning
> because
> > of
> > > 1.9 set backs because it is so new.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Hooopo <hoooopo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think ,as a beginnner, to learn Ruby 1.8 is a good way,there are so
> > >> many lib .
> > >> and also, if he has learned 1.8 ,then to learn Ruby 1.9 will be easy
> > >> for him.
> > >>
> > >> ps: sorry for my poor English.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
I don't want to buy any books but I want to learn Ruby 1.9 as well.


-- 
Tidak ada yang lebih baik dari kembali ke asal
Nothing can be better than back to the roots

--00163630f1d7c7dad2046a5fc693--